General Contractor
Wallace Brothers, Inc. (Wallace) entered into a contract with the East
Brunswick Board of Education (Board) for the construction of the New Memorial
School in the amount of $18,233,000. During the course of the project,
the Board paid Wallace a total of $19,713,664.11 through the change process.
Even though the school had been in use by the Board for two years, it was
holding a contract balance of $366,130.26 that it refused to issue to Wallace.
The Board claimed that it had issued several punch lists for Wallace to
complete but were still outstanding. Conversely, Wallace claimed that it
did not receive a final punch list from the Board until this current action was
initiated. The trial court granted summary judgment to Wallace finding that the
Board had delayed the issuance of punch lists and then only provided punch
lists full of maintenance related items wholly separate from the
contract. The Board appealed.
As there were numerous
material facts disputed at trial, the Court began its analysis by reviewing
some of the conflicted details. At trial, the Board presented evidence
that its architect issued two signed Certificates of Substantial Completion,
one in November 2012 and another in October 2013. In the certificates,
the architect struck language from the forms that denoted a punch list was
enclosed. The architect claimed that the strike-through merely
represented that the punch list was not attached. Wallace countered the strike-through
language meant that construction was in fact complete.
The Board further
claimed Wallace was issued a punch list in April 2013, before litigation ensued
in March 2014. That April 2013 punch list was referred to as the “Final Punch
List” by the architect and it contained about 300 yet to be completed items. Updates to this punch list were released in August 2013, October 2013, and November 2014. Items
that remained on the updates included:
“caulking all exposed steel, removing "stub
conduit," touching up paint on a door frame, repairing a damaged wall,
installing the vinyl base at a casework counter, removing paint from an entry
frame, installing a "backer rod," patching bolts at a side-court
basket, sanding and painting "hose bibbs," replacing crumbling grout,
and installing concrete floor sealer.”
The trial court was not
swayed by the Board’s argument on the April 2013 punch list or its contents
stating that its items were “maintenance things that would occur in the
ordinary course of using the premises, but basically it sounds like you're
holding their money hostage to make them come and do repairs that they would
not have been called upon to do.”
Notwithstanding the
above, the Board additionally argued that the trial court had disregarded
material disputes of fact such as the final payment balance contained almost
$56,000 worth of back charges and approximately $170,000 of liens on the
project. Wallace’s contract required it to refund any lien amounts
back to the Board. The Board further stated it was within its rights to
withhold the contract balance as the trial court ignored the fact that
contractually required close out documents such as “proof of payment of all
vendors, proof of insurance, subcontractor waivers, recorded drawings, proof of
tests and inspections, and the maintenance package containing manufacturers'
warranties” were never submitted by Wallace to the Board. Finally, the
Board pointed to the November 2014 punch list which denoted $163,890 worth of
work remained and the architect had yet to issue its final Certification for
Payment, which is a condition precedent for final release of all contract sums
per Wallace’s contract.
Ultimately, the Court
reversed and remanded finding that there were material facts in dispute as to
whether Wallace fully completed the contract.
---------------------------------
The author, Brendan Carter, is a contributor to The Dispute Resolver and a former Student Division Liaison to the Forum on Construction Law. He is the Director of Industry Advancement & Labor Relations with the AGC of Massachusetts based in Wellesley, MA. He may be contacted at 781.786.8916 or carter@agcmass.org.
No comments:
Post a Comment