Generative AI – The Current Breakthrough
The current breakthrough, generative AI, was recently unleashed by significant advances in the use of mathematical transformers. These breakthrough transformers are essentially giant calculators for words, which are designed to “predict” the next letter, word, sentence, or paragraph based on some observed pattern.
In the generative AI developer space, we have spent the last two years learning and optimizing how to request and receive information from these large language model calculators. There are arguably two major large language models in existence today with several others contending for the third place. These two primary large language models can be considered the “Microsoft vs. Apple” of the Generative AI landscape. While there are others, these big two, OpenAI and Anthropic, dominate. Each model has taken years to build and train, and each model strives to ingest and compute all written human knowledge in the English language. These primary large language models have a semi open-source philosophy that allows AI developers to “call” the models with computer code and then receive their calculated generative AI reply.
As developers, we pay a small fee for every single “call” to the model. This fee is charged to our developer account based on the amount of words we send, and the amount of words received back from each call. As an example, in a recent project extracting data from daily reports, over 15,000 “calls” to the big two large language models were made over a few hours. Here is where we begin to peel back the curtain on the struggles of generative AI development for construction. There is a maximum length of a question we can ask during each “call” to the models. For example, in this example I could not ask a question longer than about +/- 145 pages of text. This means we cannot simply ask AI to reply with all issues from a large construction document set. We are also limited to about 105,000 generative AI response words per minute, and thus, we cannot just ask thousands of documents a single question all at once.
Generative AI developers must code programs that work within the constraints of the current large language model call limitations along with devising condensed vector databases to store document data. The industry is working on increasing the limits allowed while also maintaining reasonable compute times for everyone to be able to use it at scale.
AI Agents and Their Applications in the Construction Industry and Claims Resolution
To space out calls to the generative AI models and be within the allowable limits, developers have created the concept of AI agents. Each AI agent is programmed to be a specialist at a specific task, and it uses a series of cascading instructions to perform a small portion of a much larger directive over time. For example, a Data Extraction Agent will read a given document page by page and extract specific facts from each page. The extracted data will then be handed to the next AI agent that specializes in analyzing construction dispute facts related to drilled shafts. Our programmed use of multiple specialized AI agents allows for the calls to the large language model to be spread over thousands of small pieces and then combined into what looks like a single response. This new AI agent process allows for a full AI task to be performed over the entire document set using multiple agents.
Below is a current list of generative AI agents that are being developed for construction dispute resolution:
1)
Deposition Review and Prep Agents
a. Reads
each e-mail and identifies main issues and conflicts
b. Recommends people to depose and specific questions to ask about specific emails
c. Prepares legal firm for potential deposition scenarios and topics
2)
Mock Trial Agents
a. Identifies strengths and
weaknesses in legal cases using a three-panel judge scenario
b. Provides legal brief and legal management plan to increase the odds of a favorable mock ruling from each judge next time
3)
Timeline Agents
a. Builds event timelines
b. Converts years of daily reports into work performed each day, by location
4)
Data Extraction Agents
a. Extracts-the-facts from repetitive document sets (Example: review each of the 16,000 daily reports and extract any facts that had to do with dewatering that day)
5)
Contract Risk Matrix Agents
a. Processes the Prime contract,
specifications requirements, special provisions requirements, and plan notes
b. Evaluates contractual risk
allocated to each party by the contract documents above
c. Prepares contract risk register
6)
Project Notice Agents
a. Processes the prime contract,
specifications requirements, and special provision requirements
b. Identifies required notice
letters and triggering compensable events listed in the contract
c. Drafts example project notice letters using anticipated real-world scenarios likely to happen on the project
7)
Project Issue Agents
a. Reads each letter and
identifies main project issue groups
b. Creates issue file (all letters organized by main and sub issue groups)
8)
Change Order Cost Estimate Agents
a. Creates full cost estimates for specific scopes of work (Noted to be getting much better over the last 60-days with new LLM model releases)
9) Project Scheduling Agents
a. Creates full project schedules for specific scopes of work (Noted to be getting much better over the last 60-days with new LLM model releases)
Concluding Remarks: Future of Generative AI
Today's professionals need to understand both the
capabilities and the limitations of generative AI. The construction industry is
at a pivotal moment where generative AI development is accelerating rapidly, and
AI agents are becoming more specialized and capable of handling increasingly
complex tasks. This article is intended to provide the reader a deeper understanding
of how to leverage generative AI within the current technological limitations.
As developers continue to push the boundaries of what's
possible with large language models, we can expect the current limitations on
call sizes and processing speeds to expand. This will enable more sophisticated
AI agents that can handle larger document sets and more complex analyses.
However, the fundamental principle remains; success with generative AI requires
deep understanding of both construction processes and AI agent processes.
The future is not about replacing human expertise with AI, but rather augmenting human capabilities with powerful analytical tools.
Author, Travis Olson, is a Director with Berkeley Research Group. He is effective at developing and applying in-house artificial intelligence agents that extract facts efficiently from construction dispute documents. He has more than seventeen years of experience in heavy civil and commercial construction encompassing major infrastructure projects including bridges, dams, water treatment facilities, light rail systems, and commercial high-rise construction.
Editor, Thanh Do, is a structural forensic engineer and expert witness with Thornton Tomasetti, Inc. He specializes in investigations of construction/design defects and collapses, Design-Build delivery, and standard of care assessment. He also oversees the Forensic Visualization group at Thornton Tomasetti, which produces graphics and animations for trial exhibits/demonstratives.
No comments:
Post a Comment